Blade Runner Part 2: It Takes One to Know One
04.12.19
Do humans have the right to destroy these creations when they defy the specifications of their programming?
One of the biggest debates among viewers is whether or not Deckard is a replicant.
For clarification, I have not seen the newer film Blade Runner: 2048.
In my opinion, I think there is strong evidence to support that Deckard is at the very least the antagonist of the film. Roy’s emotional intuition, empathy, and heroic end demonstrate a surprising shift in the character arc that align with the duties of the protagonist.
Deckard’s job forces him to act on the assumption that it is well within his rights to take down the replicants, but his lack of humaneness suggests that he himself lacks humanity. That is, that Deckard is either less human than the replicants or is himself a replicant. I
think the strongest evidence in favor or Deckard as a replicant is his adeptness in identifying the replicants by the particularities of their micromovements, and their imperceptible behaviors that would somehow alert him to their presence in the middle of a crowd. His response to Rachel’s question of whether he has ever falsely identified a human for a replicant was a definite “no.” This is way too overconfident for a human. Everyone is capable of making mistakes, so it would actually solidify the theory that Deckard is a replicant even more if he had a perfect kill streak. It takes one to know one, as they say….
Do humans have the right to destroy these creations when they defy the specifications of their programming?
One of the biggest debates among viewers is whether or not Deckard is a replicant.
For clarification, I have not seen the newer film Blade Runner: 2048.
In my opinion, I think there is strong evidence to support that Deckard is at the very least the antagonist of the film. Roy’s emotional intuition, empathy, and heroic end demonstrate a surprising shift in the character arc that align with the duties of the protagonist.
Deckard’s job forces him to act on the assumption that it is well within his rights to take down the replicants, but his lack of humaneness suggests that he himself lacks humanity. That is, that Deckard is either less human than the replicants or is himself a replicant. I
think the strongest evidence in favor or Deckard as a replicant is his adeptness in identifying the replicants by the particularities of their micromovements, and their imperceptible behaviors that would somehow alert him to their presence in the middle of a crowd. His response to Rachel’s question of whether he has ever falsely identified a human for a replicant was a definite “no.” This is way too overconfident for a human. Everyone is capable of making mistakes, so it would actually solidify the theory that Deckard is a replicant even more if he had a perfect kill streak. It takes one to know one, as they say….
Comments
Post a Comment